Our colleague Ruth recently received this email about a survey on scholarly communications and we thought it would be useful to offer our research community the chance to take part. Here's what the email said...
How do open (access)
publication strategies fit into a research workflow? Do researchers use Google
Drive instead of Word? Papers instead of Endnote? Google Scholar instead of
Scopus? Megajournals instead of topical journals? ResearchGate instead of
repositories? We are engaged in an ongoing effort to chart the evolving
landscape of scholarly communication (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826).
New tools are constantly being developed, as reflected in our list of 400+
scholarly communication tools (http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list).
Researchers vote with their feet on these changes by adopting or rejecting new
modes of working. With an international survey we intend to investigate how
tool usage varies by field, country and position. The survey will run until
February 2016.
A SURVEY. WHERE? HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE?
If you have not yet done so, please take this graphical survey:
https://innoscholcomm.typeform.com/to/Csvr7b?source=ML
People tell us it is easy and fun to fill it out by just clicking the tools you
use. It takes 8-12 minutes to complete and you can opt to receive a visual
characterization of your workflow compared to that of your peer group.
FOR WHOM?
Anyone carrying out research (from Master's students to professors), or
supporting research (such as librarians, publishers and funders) can
participate.
HOW CAN I HELP?
Kind of you to ask! If you want to help make this a success please
consider passing it along to people not on this list (researchers, librarians etc.).
And yes, feel free to share the link on your website, Twitter, LinkedIn,
Facebook etc..
More specifically, do you represent an institution/society that wishes to
promote this survey among its members? Then please contact us. We can arrange a
special URL that will enable us to provide you with resulting data for just
your organization. That way you can see what tools your members are using,
compared to overall usage patterns. We do the work, you get the (anonymized)
data.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
We will post preliminary results here: https://101innovations.wordpress.com/
On this site, you can also find background information on the survey.
Eventually we will share our (thoroughly anonymized) data. Would you like to
work with those data? We are interested to hear what kind of analyses you would
like to carry out or see carried out! There are many hypotheses that can be
tested with the data that comes from this survey. In the field of Open Access I
can think of many:
- Do researchers choose either Gold or
Green OA or do they combine these approaches?
- Are researchers that share in an early
phase (workflows, data, posters) more likely to also publish OA or archive
their papers in repositories?
- Do researchers use search tools that have
an option to restrict to publications that are OA available?
- etc.
The data also allows to discern between different positions, affiliation
countries and career lengths.
Please support this research by taking the survey or promoting it.
Many thanks!
CONTACT
Bianca Kramer @MsPhelps b.m.r.kramer@uu.nl<mailto:b.m.r.kramer@uu.nl>
Jeroen Bosman @jeroenbosman j.bosman@uu.nl<mailto:j.bosman@uu.nl>
(both at Utrecht University Library in The Netherlands)
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
Wednesday, 20 May 2015
Summer researcher support sessions
We've got a new block of researcher support sessions coming up this summer and we're really excited about some new workshops. You'll find the full list of workshops in the calendar on this blog, you can have a look at the picture below or be in touch to get a pdf or hard copy sent to you. Please join us if you can and share the invitation widely.
Thursday, 14 May 2015
Fountains Summer Opening Hours
Summer holidays are not far off. Even if you, as an academic, may well see summer holidays as a prime time to buckle down on your research, many YSJ students will be off campus for the summer. For that reason, Fountains Learning Centre will have different opening hours starting from Monday 1 June. The most significant difference is that floors 1 and 2 will shut at 5PM on a Friday and the ground floor will remain open til 7PM on a Friday for self-service use.
Complete information on what bits of the building are open when can be found on ILS' website.
Remember, your Academic Liaison Librarian will also be around for most of the summer and it's a great time to catch up with us. Come in for a tutorial so we can tell you about new resources in your discipline, changes to search tools, reference management ideas or anything else you might need.
Complete information on what bits of the building are open when can be found on ILS' website.
Remember, your Academic Liaison Librarian will also be around for most of the summer and it's a great time to catch up with us. Come in for a tutorial so we can tell you about new resources in your discipline, changes to search tools, reference management ideas or anything else you might need.
Friday, 8 May 2015
Do you need to just write?
ILS' researcher support sessions fit in nicely with the new Research Skills Development programme run by the Academic Development Directorate. The following guest post, about a new programme offered by the ADD to help you get writing, is by post-graduate researcher Charlotte Haines-Lyon.
Writing is
often argued to be at the heart of research but it rarely comes easily,
especially when there are so many other things to do.
York St John’s is trying a Just Write session. This is a
quiet hour in which you can come along and get writing – it might be writing up
notes after reading or fieldwork, finishing off that chapter, or getting to
grips with an abstract. Whatever it is come along to Room FT113 at 12 noon with
your writing implements – or just use one of the many computers provided.
If you are
facing a bit of writers block, then we will also be running “Bring a Thing”
sessions. Again they will last one hour, but these will include short exercises
to get you writing. Bring a blank page, a pencil, typing fingers, something
you are stuck on, a single word. . . just come along with some lunch and enjoy.
Hope to see
you there!
Just Write
- Dates: 11th May, 1st June, 6th July
- Time: 12:00 – 13:00
- Room: FT113
Bring a Thing
- Dates: 18th May, 15th June
- Time: 12:00 – 13:00
- Room: FT113
For
further information please contact:
- Dr. Victoria Carpenter
- Charlotte Haines Lyon (c.haineslyon@yorksj.ac.uk)
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Open Library of Humanities
A consortium of libraries and academics has banded together to create a platform (or what they're called a mega-journal) to support gold open access in the Humanities. It's called the Open Library of Humanities and there are already an array of editors and referees in place, so anything published in the library will be subject to double-blind peer review and editorial scrutiny. They plan to launch and host 5 new open access journals in September 2015 and are currently welcoming any other OA journals in the humanities that might like to join up. More about the OLH plans and model can be found here.
What's interesting about this model is that there will be no Article Processing Charge (APC) for publishing in the journals. Because the economics of the Humanities are different from other disciplines in the natural and social sciences, the OLH recognises that coming up with the requisite £600-£2000 to publish in gold OA journals isn't going to be possible for most humanities researchers. There's a major funding agreement in place with JISC, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and an institutional subscription model from universities (Leah's alma mater, Wesleyan, is one of the most recent universities to sign up).
The names and institutional affiliations of the librarians consulting on the project are impressive. Does it look like something that's going to be useful in your discipline?
OpenLibHums Twitter feed.
What's interesting about this model is that there will be no Article Processing Charge (APC) for publishing in the journals. Because the economics of the Humanities are different from other disciplines in the natural and social sciences, the OLH recognises that coming up with the requisite £600-£2000 to publish in gold OA journals isn't going to be possible for most humanities researchers. There's a major funding agreement in place with JISC, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and an institutional subscription model from universities (Leah's alma mater, Wesleyan, is one of the most recent universities to sign up).
The names and institutional affiliations of the librarians consulting on the project are impressive. Does it look like something that's going to be useful in your discipline?
OpenLibHums Twitter feed.
Tuesday, 5 May 2015
Elsevier's Open Access Policies
Elsevier have updated their policies on green open access and there has been some initial, critical reaction (suprised?) which you can read about on this scholarly communication blog. If you'd like to talk more about what green open access means to you at YSJ and how our research repository can help improve the reach and impact of your research, please come along to ILS' next Researcher Support session on RaY, Thursday 7 May at 9:00AM in DG 104.
Friday, 1 May 2015
More on impact factors and complementary metrics
As promised in the most recent post, here is the presentation we gave on impact factors, altmetrics, and all that jazz.
There have been various updates in this area this week, especially when it comes to altmetrics. The company that runs this service announced some changes in the way they display metrics data to users. Some researchers, having looked into this further, are worried that it will affect their ability to evaluate how their work is being used. We're going to look into this more ourselves, but it is clear that measuring research impact and influence has moved far beyond the traditional journal impact factor already.
There have been various updates in this area this week, especially when it comes to altmetrics. The company that runs this service announced some changes in the way they display metrics data to users. Some researchers, having looked into this further, are worried that it will affect their ability to evaluate how their work is being used. We're going to look into this more ourselves, but it is clear that measuring research impact and influence has moved far beyond the traditional journal impact factor already.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)